| 
 This is Joe: He’s a senior interaction designer who works for a large digital consultancy in London. And he’s spent the last few years designing complex products and services for GOV.UK. Before he signed up to Form Design Mastery he told me that he lacked clarity in: 
 I get it. Because when I first started making forms, they seemed so simple on the face of it. But as soon as you delve a bit deeper, you uncover a world of complexity. And questions start popping into your head like: 
 But here’s what Joe told me after he finished Form Design Mastery and started applying the lessons: “Now when someone questions my design, I’m able to confidently communicate every aspect of the approach in a simple way. The course has made my life so much easier.” Maybe you can relate to Joe. Maybe you could do with some clarity on these things. Or maybe you just want to work more effectively with your colleagues who are adamant on using complex, inaccessible patterns that degrade UX. Either way, I’d love to help. I relaunched Form Design Mastery on Sunday. And Joe messaged me in response: “For someone who has the original Form Design Mastery – do you think it’s worth getting 2.0? Is there substantial new material and videos? I’m on the fence and what would tip me over is if there is a lot more content on super complex forms.“ Not going to lie, I couldn’t believe Joe liked Form Design Mastery so much so that he was considering purchasing the new version. But like I told Joe, all existing students get the new version (and any new future material) for free. About Joe’s question: I’ve refined and improved pretty much every core lesson including the modules on complex multi-step form flows and supersized forms. But here’s a quick rundown of what’s new on top of that: 
 Honestly, I was really happy with the original Form Design Mastery course and so were my students: Throughout the course I asked for feedback and out of 175 responses, the average score was 9.07 (out of 10) and 110 out of the 175 responses gave it a 10! But Form Design Mastery 2.0 is so much better. Here’s a link so you can check it out: See you soon,  p.s. If you have any questions, let me know.  | 
Join 9000+ designers, content designers and engineers who get my free weekly newsletter with evidence-based design tips (in 3 minutes or less). Mostly forms UX, but not always.
A year ago I posted this on LinkedIn: === I tell my students to avoid select boxes. Because it’s often better to use radio buttons. But students often say “But it’ll make the page too long”. Yep, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad UX. See the page I designed to let users select a course. Huge list of radio buttons. But no issues in user research whatsoever. Does this mean you should always use radio buttons? No. But most designers would balk at a design like this even though it worked...
Last week, I had a meeting with two devs and two designers. The meeting’s purpose was to let developers raise problems and get quick design decisions. One of the devs brought up an issue with a form that had conditional radio buttons. Here’s what the screen looked like (it’s a bit different to what I’m actually working on but close enough): When the user selects “Yes” it reveals a field to enter the name: If you leave it blank and submit the form, the page refreshes and shows an error: So far...
Quick one: Yesterday I sent you an email “My response to Hacker news comments”. I received a few responses asking for clarification in my second illustration – because I screwed it up. Here’s what it should have been: Enjoy,Adam