The problem with GroupCollect’s announcement form (perhaps you can redesign it?)


GroupCollect helps tour operators organise trips for groups.

Their biggest market is school trips.

The form below allows tour operators to send announcements to parents to chase late payment or tell them about a change to the itinerary:

On the face of it, the form looks straightforward:

  1. The trip name, date and location appears at the top for context
  2. The h1 heading clearly explains the purpose of the form
  3. The fields look like fields (with clear borders all around)
  4. The submit button is aligned to the left edge of the last input (where users expect to find it)

So that’s good.

But as you look more closely things unravel.

For example, take a look at the radio buttons for “Communication method”:

There are three main issues with this field:

Issue #1: The radio buttons use ticks for the selected state

Radio buttons and checkboxes are different.

Only one radio button can be selected and that’s indicated with a filled dot.

Multiple checkboxes can be selected and that’s indicated with a tick.

This is not just conventionally the right thing to do - it gives users the ability to quickly understand the difference between the two controls.

As it is, users might think that they can select multiple options. And when they’re unable to, it’ll be frustrating and confusing.

Issue #2: The radio buttons are laid out horizontally

This is problematic because:

  1. They’re harder to scan and compare
  2. Some of the options are more likely to be missed, especially for users who zoom in with a screen magnifier
  3. Even if the user realises they need to pan across, it‘s more effort to do so
  4. You can’t lay them out like this on small screens, which unnecessarily makes the experience inconsistent across screen sizes

Laying them out vertically addresses these issues.

Issue #3: The question asks for two answers at the same time

The question doesn’t just ask about how to contact people, it also asks about who to contact.

The options are also an incomplete mix of the two. For example, you can email and text account holders but you can only text passengers.

It gets more confusing when you select “Text passengers” because a line suddenly appears below to say:

“Non travelling trip leaders can only receive email notifications.”

The first thing I’d do is split the question into two because:

Two easy questions are quicker to fill out than one hard question.

But to design this properly, we need to understand the domain. And right now, that’s unclear.

  • What actually is an account holder? The person who booked? A parent? A teacher?
  • Can an account holder also be a passenger?
  • Is “passenger” the right word to use?

And given we’ve only discussed one of the fields in the form, there’s a lot more to consider.

I don’t have time to do that.

But maybe you do:

GroupCollect is looking for a senior designer to work remotely on this form - and the rest of the product.

I've spoken to the guys at GroupCollect - they know this stuff is hard and care about doing it right, which is rare in our industry.

So if you’re looking for a new role and think you could help, click the link below:

​https://groupcollect.notion.site/Product-Designer-at-GroupCollect-2cd6470adf8c80708c90cbe527aa53cd​

Cheers,
Adam

p.s. if you end up getting the role, let me know. I'd love to hear how the redesign went.

Design tips to help you create products that are ridiculously simple and accessible to use

Join 10,000+ designers, content designers and engineers who get my free weekly newsletter with evidence-based design tips (in 3 minutes or less). Mostly forms UX, but not always.

Read more from Design tips to help you create products that are ridiculously simple and accessible to use
Me holding a sign saying "Test boring patterns first."

Last week, someone paid me to review their form flow. One thing they wanted advice about was interruption pages. Coincidentally, the following day the GOV.UK Design System added the interruption page pattern. Interruption pages are designed to pause the user within a journey - usually to warn them about a possible mistake or give them important information before they continue. Here’s an example from the GOV.UK Design System: It has: An h1 heading to ask a simple question A paragraph to...

Me holding a sign saying, "We all have fuzzy edges."

Last week, Kate Ivey-Williams, the Head of UCD on my programme, asked me: “What do you think your role is as a designer?” I said: “Errr... I design products that are easy to use... errr... I realise that’s a rubbish answer...” Kate saved me: “Don’t worry, I put you on the spot” But even so, as a designer you should be ready to be put on the spot because: If you aren’t able to explain what you do, it’s much harder for your teammates and stakeholders to value what you do. I messaged Kate later...

Me holding a sign that says, "Good UX is holistic."

Last week, I ran a live training on file upload UX. Every day leading up to the event, I was stressed, constantly thinking: “Shall I just purchase one month of Zoom?” Let me explain: I use Circle to run my courses and it comes with something called Live Rooms. It’s like Zoom. But Live Rooms is better than Zoom because: it’s quicker and easier to set up for me it comes with my Circle subscription for free it automatically posts the recording afterward the call it has better UX for my students...